What problem does it solve? Legal professionals must assess whether evidence can be admitted in court and how much weight it carries, a task that varies sharply across civil, criminal, and administrative litigation in China. This Skill provides a structured framework for reviewing each piece of evidence against the "three properties" (authenticity, legality, relevance) and probative value, then synthesizing a whole-case conclusion against the applicable burden of proof. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Three-Property Review: Systematic checklists for authenticity, legality (including illegal evidence exclusion), and relevance for every evidence item. - Type-Specific Probative Value Rules: Dedicated evaluation tables for documentary evidence, witness testimony, electronic data, expert opinions, and party statements. - Evidence Chain Analysis: Maps corroboration and contradiction relationships, checks chain completeness, and measures findings against standards like beyond reasonable doubt or high probability. - Use Case: In a private lending dispute, evaluate an original IOU, bank transfer records, unnotarized WeChat screenshots, and a non-appearing witness statement to determine which facts are proven and what evidence needs reinforcement. ## Quick Start Evaluate the admissibility and probative value of the evidence list in my civil loan dispute case and produce a full-case evidence assessment report with reinforcement suggestions.
