evaluator-contract-review

Review sprint proposals to produce contracts with acceptance criteria.

28|2|Updated Feb 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/thompson0012/agents-stack --skill evaluator-contract-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: evaluator-contract-review
Source: https://github.com/thompson0012/agents-stack/tree/main/templates/.agents/skills/using-agents-stack/evaluator-contract-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/thompson0012/agents-stack --skill evaluator-contract-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Adversarial review ensures sprint proposals are thoroughly challenged to reveal gaps and produce a clear, enforceable contract.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Adversarially critiquing sprint proposals to identify gaps, risks, and ambiguities.
  • Producing precise revision feedback and a durable contract that is testable and auditable.
  • Verifying boundaries, acceptance criteria, and observed evidence using stable artifacts.

Quick Start

Provide the sprint proposal and related inputs, and let evaluator-contract-review generate a contract or actionable revision notes.

Frequently Asked Questions about evaluator-contract-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is adversarial review for sprint contracts?▼

Adversarial review challenges sprint proposals to uncover gaps, risks, and ambiguities, producing a precise, enforceable contract with testable acceptance criteria and verifiable boundaries.

How do I create acceptance criteria for a sprint proposal?▼

Define acceptance criteria using AC-### IDs, including before, action, and after verifications. Adversarial review ensures these criteria are explicit, testable, and auditable within the final contract.

Can I use this for backlog management without an existing sprint proposal?▼

No, adversarial contract review requires an existing sprint proposal file at .harness/<workstream-id>/sprint_proposal.md and related reference docs to function properly.

What's the best way to handle revision notes from a sprint proposal evaluation?▼

When gaps are found during proposal evaluation, the process outputs structured revision notes identifying specific deficiencies, allowing you to refine the proposal before generating a final contract.

Does contract review work without explicit boundaries in the proposal?▼

No, explicit boundaries are required. Adversarial review validates that sprint proposals contain defined boundaries, AC-### ID acceptance criteria, and before/action/after verifications before producing a contract.

Why does my sprint contract need before, action, and after verifications?▼

Before, action, and after verifications ensure observed evidence is testable and auditable. They provide stable artifacts that validate acceptance criteria and confirm contract compliance.