evaluation

Build evaluation frameworks to test and measure agent system performance.

9|2|Updated Jan 31, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/AbdullahMalik17/Hacathan_5 --skill evaluation-abdullahmalik17
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: evaluation
Source: https://github.com/AbdullahMalik17/Hacathan_5/tree/main/.claude/skills/evaluation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/AbdullahMalik17/Hacathan_5 --skill evaluation-abdullahmalik17

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Agent systems are non-deterministic and can take multiple valid paths to a goal, making traditional pass/fail testing ineffective. This Skill provides rubrics, test set design, and monitoring patterns to systematically measure agent quality, catch regressions, and validate context engineering choices. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Multi-Dimensional Rubrics: Score agent outputs across factual accuracy, completeness, citation accuracy, source quality, and tool efficiency with weighted overall scores. - Evaluation Runner and Test Sets: Build complexity-stratified test sets and run automated evaluation pipelines with pass/fail thresholds and dimension-level summaries. - Production Monitoring: Sample live interactions, track pass rates over time, and trigger alerts when quality drops below warning or critical thresholds. - Use Case: Before deploying a new agent configuration, run it against a stratified test set, compare dimension scores against the baseline, and block the release if the overall score falls below 0.7. ## Quick Start Use the evaluation skill to build a rubric-based test harness that scores my agent's responses on accuracy and completeness.

Frequently Asked Questions about evaluation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate an AI agent's performance systematically?▼

Evaluate agent performance with multi-dimensional rubrics covering factual accuracy, completeness, citation accuracy, source quality, and tool efficiency. Run the agent against a complexity-stratified test set and compute weighted overall scores with a pass threshold such as 0.7.

How to design a test set for agent evaluation?▼

Design test sets by sampling from real usage patterns, adding known edge cases, and stratifying across complexity levels from simple single-tool lookups to very complex multi-step reasoning. Start with small samples early in development since changes produce large measurable effects.

What is LLM-as-judge evaluation for agents?▼

LLM-as-judge evaluation uses a language model to score agent outputs against a rubric at scale. Provide the task description, agent output, ground truth if available, and level descriptions, then request a structured judgment per dimension.

Why do traditional unit tests fail for agent systems?▼

Traditional tests fail because agents are non-deterministic and can take multiple valid paths to the same goal. Evaluation should judge outcomes and process reasonableness rather than checking for specific execution steps.

How do I monitor agent quality in production?▼

Monitor production quality by randomly sampling a fraction of interactions, scoring them with the evaluation rubric, and tracking pass rates over time. Set alerts when pass rate drops below warning (0.85) or critical (0.70) thresholds.