eval-before-optimize

Validate whether evaluation improvements are statistically meaningful before optimizing post-training models.

1|Updated Apr 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/KangOxford/auto-quant-research --skill eval-before-optimize
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: eval-before-optimize
Source: https://github.com/KangOxford/auto-quant-research/tree/main/execution-layer/skills/eval-before-optimize
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/KangOxford/auto-quant-research --skill eval-before-optimize

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Verifying eval precision before claiming improvements from RL/ES post-training to prevent mistaking noise for learning.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Validate eval noise floor by repeating evaluations across seeds and runs to establish a robust baseline.
  • Compute required sample size and baseline variance to determine when results are statistically meaningful.
  • Apply guardrails before proceeding with post-training optimizations to avoid pursuing spurious gains.

Quick Start

Run a baseline eval to measure noise and then decide whether the observed improvement is confident enough to pursue post-training optimization.

Frequently Asked Questions about eval-before-optimize

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I check if my post-training eval results are statistically significant?▼

To verify post-training eval results are statistically significant, repeat evaluations across seeds to establish baseline variance and compute required sample size to confirm results exceed the noise floor.

How do I measure eval noise floor for RL experiments?▼

Measure eval noise floor for RL experiments by repeating evaluations across multiple seeds and runs, establishing a robust baseline variance to distinguish actual learning from noise.

Why does my evaluation variance change between post-training runs?▼

Evaluation variance fluctuates between post-training runs due to seed differences and sampling randomness, requiring repeated evals to establish a baseline before claiming improvements.

What is the best way to prevent mistaking noise for signal in ES optimization?▼

The best way to prevent mistaking noise for signal in ES optimization is applying threshold-based guardrails after repeated evals to validate statistical significance before proceeding.

How do I know when to continue optimization after post-training?▼

Know when to continue optimization after post-training by running a baseline variance check and applying threshold-based decisions to confirm observed improvements are confident enough to pursue.

Can I use repeated evals for small-scale post-training experiments?▼

Repeated evals work for small-scale post-training experiments across varying models and evaluation setups, computing required sample size to determine when results become statistically meaningful.