What problem does it solve? A single review pass often misses failure modes because one perspective cannot cover requirements coverage, architectural soundness, and code quality at once. This Skill runs a multi-agent debate review so completed work gets judged from several independent angles before it ships. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Independent Judge Panel: Spawns 2-4 specialized judge agents (Requirements Validator, Solution Architect, Code Quality Reviewer) that review work in isolation with evidence-based findings. - Debate and Reconciliation: Maps consensus versus conflicts, feeds opposing positions back to judges, and resolves or records genuine disagreements without manufacturing consensus. - Prioritized Consensus Report: Produces one severity-ranked report with a Ship / Fix-first / Rework verdict, judge scorecard, and concrete action items. - Use Case: Before merging a large feature branch, ask for a multi-perspective critique to get independent verdicts on requirements coverage, design soundness, and code quality, with every finding backed by file:line evidence. ## Quick Start Ask the agent to run a critique panel review on your recent changes and return a consensus verdict with severity-ranked findings.
