What problem does it solve? Research teams often turn experimental results into claims without verifying that the evidence actually supports them, producing overstated conclusions and unrecoverable handoffs. This Skill enforces a review-gated workflow so that only evidence passing a typed review can become claims, limitations, or paper sections. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Evidence-Gated Claim Writing: Builds a claim table linking each claim to its supporting artifact, metric, review lane, limitation, and confidence before any prose is written. - Review Verdict Enforcement: Routes experiments without a valid typed review to the review skill, blocks promotion of failed or needs-human verdicts, and preserves negative or inconclusive results as valid analyses. - Polishing and Writing Routing: Delegates existing manuscript prose to the Nature polishing workflow and new manuscript drafting to the Nature writing workflow when the Academic package is installed, with an evidence-preserving fallback. - Use Case: After an experiment passes review, use this Skill to write an analysis document that states the hypothesis, change, result, tradeoff, and next candidate, then record the analysis node in the research graph and produce a recoverable handoff. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to summarize only the reviewed evidence, its limitations, and the next defensible step for the current experiment.
