What problem does it solve? Legal analysis of EU law, international treaties, and human rights matters is highly error-prone because treaty articles, regulation numbers, and court deadlines change frequently and are often misquoted from memory. This Skill enforces a hard anti-hallucination gate requiring every provision, deadline, and case citation to be verified online in official sources (ISAP, EUR-Lex, HUDOC, CURIA) before use. ## Core Features & Use Cases - 12 domain modules: Covers TUE/TFUE primary law and preliminary references (art. 267 TFUE), ECHR/ECtHR complaints (4-month deadline), the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, cross-border enforcement (Brussels Ia/IIB, European Payment Order), private international law (Rome I/II, succession, Hague conventions), UN human rights pacts, NATO/SOFA agreements, small border traffic, FDI screening and BIT/ISDS arbitration, Vienna conventions on diplomatic/consular relations, and the 1951 Geneva Refugee Convention. - Hard verification gates: Prohibits citing any article, deadline, or case signature from model memory; mandates fresh checks in isap.sejm.gov.pl, eur-lex.europa.eu, hudoc.echr.coe.int, and curia.europa.eu. - Structured legal workflow: Each module provides intake checklists, evidence matrices, procedural maps, strategy guidance, counter-arguments, risk assessment, and output quality gates. - Use Case: A lawyer preparing an ECtHR complaint uses the EKPC module to verify the 4-month filing deadline, confirm exhaustion of domestic remedies, and build an evidence matrix before drafting. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to analyze a cross-border legal matter involving EU law or human rights, for example to assess admissibility of a complaint to the European Court of Human Rights after a final Polish court decision.
