dr-11-cyfrowe-cyber-ai-dane-ip

Analyzes Polish and EU digital law cases covering GDPR, AI Act, NIS2, and intellectual property.

134|32|Updated Jun 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/michaleiatrak-star/Lex-Machina --skill dr-11-cyfrowe-cyber-ai-dane-ip-michaleiatrak-star
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: dr-11-cyfrowe-cyber-ai-dane-ip
Source: https://github.com/michaleiatrak-star/Lex-Machina/tree/main/Wersja%20rozwojowa%20rozpakowana/dr-11-cyfrowe-cyber-ai-dane-ip
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/michaleiatrak-star/Lex-Machina --skill dr-11-cyfrowe-cyber-ai-dane-ip-michaleiatrak-star

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Legal professionals and laypersons working with Polish and EU digital law face a fast-changing regulatory landscape (AI Act rollout phases, NIS2 transposition, DORA, MiCA) where citing outdated or hallucinated provisions carries real risk. This Skill provides a structured domain module for digital law, cybersecurity, AI, data protection, and IP cases with mandatory online verification gates that forbid citing any article, effective date, or case signature from model memory. ## Core Features & Use Cases - 22 legal modules, one per statute: GDPR/RODO (including DPIA, DSAR, and records-of-processing operational modules), KSC/NIS2 cybersecurity, AI Act with the Polish AI systems act, DORA/eIDAS, DSA, DMA, CRA/Data Act, MiCA crypto-assets, copyright and industrial property, electronic services, e-signature, and open data. - Hard anti-hallucination gates: every provision must be verified in ISAP (isap.sejm.gov.pl) for Polish acts and EUR-Lex for EU regulations before citation, with a mandatory self-check against unverified claims before any answer is sent. - Deterministic operational workflows: DSAR deadline calculation per Regulation 1182/71, DPIA threshold screening using UODO lists and EDPB WP248 criteria, and completeness checklists for processing agreements under GDPR art. 28. - Use Case: A company receives a data subject access request and a related UODO complaint. The Skill classifies the request under GDPR art. 15–22, computes the one-month deadline deterministically, drafts the response with refusal gates checked, and routes the UODO proceeding through the dedicated administrative module. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to analyze your digital law, data protection, AI compliance, or IP question under Polish and EU law, and it will load the relevant module and verify every cited provision online before answering.

Frequently Asked Questions about dr-11-cyfrowe-cyber-ai-dane-ip

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I handle a GDPR data subject access request under Polish law?▼

The DSAR module classifies the request under GDPR art. 15–22, computes the one-month deadline deterministically using Regulation 1182/71 rules, checks refusal gates under art. 12(5), and drafts a response with a request register entry. Final decisions on deletion or export remain with the human administrator.

When is a DPIA required under GDPR art. 35?▼

The DPIA module applies three deterministic screening paths: the current UODO list of mandatory operations, the EDPB WP248 nine-criteria rule where two or more criteria trigger the requirement, and the obligatory cases in art. 35(3). The result is stated as required, recommended, or not required with per-criterion justification.

Does this Skill cover the EU AI Act and the Polish AI systems act?▼

Yes, a dedicated module covers AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 including prohibited practices, high-risk system obligations, GPAI rules, and penalty tiers, plus the Polish act on AI systems establishing the KRiBSI supervisory authority. Application-phase dates must be re-verified online before each use.

Can I use this Skill on ChatGPT or other hosts besides Claude?▼

Yes, the Skill is host-neutral and includes a runtime adapter mapping semantic operations like web_search and file views to equivalent native functions on Claude, ChatGPT, Codex, and Grok. The shared verification resources remain a separate canonical skill and are never vendored into this package.

Why does the Skill refuse to cite legal provisions from memory?▼

EU digital law changes rapidly with staged application dates, so the Skill enforces a hard gate requiring verification of every article, effective date, and penalty in ISAP or EUR-Lex before citation. If verification tools are unavailable, the answer must be explicitly marked as unverified rather than relying on model memory.

What are the limitations of the DR-11 digital law module?▼

Coverage is operational rather than article-by-article complete: copyright holds B+ status without full-act audit, one cybersecurity certification module is an acknowledged stub pending full entry into force, and criminal qualification of IP infringements requires combining with the separate criminal law skill DR-03.