dr-08-samorzad-terytorialny-prawo-lokalne

Analyzes Polish local government law covering municipalities, counties, voivodeships, local acts, and supervision.

134|32|Updated Jun 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/michaleiatrak-star/Lex-Machina --skill dr-08-samorzad-terytorialny-prawo-lokalne-michaleiatrak-star
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: dr-08-samorzad-terytorialny-prawo-lokalne
Source: https://github.com/michaleiatrak-star/Lex-Machina/tree/main/Wersja%20rozwojowa%20rozpakowana/dr-08-samorzad-terytorialny-prawo-lokalne
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/michaleiatrak-star/Lex-Machina --skill dr-08-samorzad-terytorialny-prawo-lokalne-michaleiatrak-star

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Legal work on Polish local government (samorząd terytorialny) requires navigating dozens of statutes, local council resolutions, and supervision procedures where citing an outdated or wrong provision invalidates the entire analysis. This Skill structures that domain into verified modules with mandatory source-checking gates. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Domain modules per statute: 20 modules covering gmina/powiat/województwo structure, council resolutions, supervision by the Voivode and RIO, local spatial planning (MPZP/WZ/ZPI), local taxes and fees, paid parking zones, crisis management, and communal services. - Anti-hallucination hard gates: every article number, deadline, or case signature must be verified live in ISAP/ELI or official journals before being cited; local acts are read from voivodeship official journals and BIP, never from model memory. - Act maps and coverage tracking: MAPA-AKTOW.md and MAPA-POKRYCIA.md record the current consolidated text (Dz.U. reference) and audit status for each of the 21 covered acts. - Use Case: A resident receives a payment demand for a paid parking zone. The Skill routes to the SPP module, establishes that the demand is not appealable to the administrative court, and directs the defense to objections under art. 33 UPEA within the 7-day deadline. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to analyze a Polish local government matter, such as challenging a municipal council resolution or a paid parking fee, and it will load the relevant DR-08 module with mandatory source verification.

Frequently Asked Questions about dr-08-samorzad-terytorialny-prawo-lokalne

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I challenge a municipal council resolution in Poland?▼

A person whose legal interest is violated can file a complaint to the voivodeship administrative court under art. 101 of the Local Government Act. The Skill checks the current wording in ISAP, verifies the resolution's publication in the voivodeship official journal, and confirms deadlines before drafting.

How to defend against a paid parking zone fee demand in Poland?▼

A parking payment demand in an SPP zone is not an administrative decision and cannot be appealed to the administrative court. Defense happens through objections to the enforcement title under art. 33 UPEA within a strict 7-day deadline from delivery.

Does this Skill cite Polish statutes from memory?▼

No. A hard gate forbids citing any article, deadline, penalty, or case signature from model memory. Every provision must be verified live in ISAP/ELI, and local acts must be read from the voivodeship official journal or BIP.

What is the difference between Voivode and RIO supervision over local government?▼

The Voivode supervises the legality of resolutions and ordinances, with challenges going to the voivodeship administrative court. RIO supervises budgetary and financial acts, and its resolutions are challenged directly to the Supreme Administrative Court.

Can the Skill analyze local spatial planning disputes like MPZP or ZPI?▼

Yes. A dedicated module covers local spatial plans, zoning decisions, and Integrated Investment Plans, including documented abuse patterns such as exceeding plan parameters or restricting public consultations, with supervision and court challenge paths.