doubt-driven-development

Review code with an adversarial mindset using structured prompts and finding classification.

Updated May 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/soloamente/still --skill doubt-driven-development-soloamente
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: doubt-driven-development
Source: https://github.com/soloamente/still/tree/main/.cursor/skills/doubt-driven-development
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/soloamente/still --skill doubt-driven-development-soloamente

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill fosters a mindset that prioritizes correctness and thorough review over rapid development, particularly in high-stakes or unfamiliar code scenarios.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Adversarial Code Review: Encourages a fresh, skeptical perspective on every non-trivial code decision.
  • Decision Analysis: Provides a structured framework for reviewing and challenging assumptions.
  • Use Case: Before deploying a critical update, use this Skill to ensure that each decision is thoroughly vetted, reducing the risk of production errors.

Quick Start

Initiate a doubt-driven development cycle for a new feature by following the provided checklist.

Frequently Asked Questions about doubt-driven-development

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is adversarial code review and how does it validate correctness?▼

Adversarial code review analyzes code decisions by adopting a skeptical mindset to challenge assumptions. It classifies findings using structured review prompts, ensuring correctness over speed in high-stakes development scenarios.

How do I perform an adversarial code review before deployment?▼

To perform an adversarial code review, initiate a doubt-driven development cycle using a provided checklist of structured review prompts. This process systematically challenges non-trivial code decisions and classifies the findings.

Does this approach work for reviewing unfamiliar code scenarios?▼

Yes, doubt-driven development is specifically applicable for unfamiliar code scenarios where correctness is paramount. It encourages developers to approach every non-trivial decision with a fresh, skeptical perspective.

How does adversarial review differ from standard code analysis?▼

Adversarial review prioritizes correctness over speed by actively challenging assumptions, unlike standard code analysis. It provides a structured framework to classify findings rather than simply scanning for syntax or style issues.

When should I prioritize decision validation over rapid development?▼

You should prioritize decision validation over rapid development in high-stakes scenarios or when working with unfamiliar code. This ensures every non-trivial code decision is thoroughly vetted before deployment.