What problem does it solve?
Many collaborative documents fail because authors and reviewers do not share the same context, leading to unclear proposals, missing assumptions, and time-consuming revision cycles. This workflow closes the context gap, structures iterative drafting, and validates the doc from a fresh-reader perspective so the final document actually works for its audience.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Three-stage guided workflow: Context Gathering, Refinement & Structure, and Reader Testing to move from raw context to a production-ready document.
- Iterative section-by-section drafting: Clarifying questions, brainstorming, curation, drafting, and surgical edits with artifact operations (create_file, str_replace) to learn author preferences.
- Reader validation and connector integration: Predict reader questions, run fresh-instance tests via sub-agents when available, and check for ambiguities, missing assumptions, and accessibility issues (e.g., images without alt-text).
- Use Case: Producing a technical specification or decision document with multiple stakeholders and linked artifacts, where context transfer and reader validation are critical.
Quick Start
Use the doc-coauthoring workflow to draft a decision document by dumping context, choosing a section structure, and iteratively refining each section until reader testing passes.
