discussion-validate

Validate discussion documents against the SDD standard for structure and ownership.

31|5|Updated Jan 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/NSEvteev/FullSpec --skill discussion-validate-nsevteev
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: discussion-validate
Source: https://github.com/NSEvteev/FullSpec/tree/main/.claude/skills/discussion-validate
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/NSEvteev/FullSpec --skill discussion-validate-nsevteev

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Discussions often fail to adhere to a standardized structure, causing confusion and delays during reviews. By validating frontmatter, naming, sections, numbering, markers, and ownership responsibilities, this Skill ensures consistent, high-quality discourse documentation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Validation Scope: checks on frontmatter presence, required fields, and consistency with SDD.
  • Structural Checks: verifies section names, order, numbering, and markers.
  • Ownership & Responsibilities: ensures clear ownership mapping and accountability.

Quick Start

Validate specs/analysis/0001-auth-oauth2/discussion.md against the SDD standard.

Frequently Asked Questions about discussion-validate

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate discussion docs against the SDD standard?▼

To validate discussion docs, you check them for frontmatter presence, section structure, numbering, markers, and ownership mapping. This identifies and reports any deviations from the established SDD standard.

Can I run batch validation across multiple discussion files in the specs directory?▼

Yes, you can run batch validation across the specs directory. The tool supports checking individual discussions and batch validation to support code reviews and pre-commit checks.

What structural checks are enforced for SDD frontmatter and sections?▼

Structural checks enforce frontmatter presence, required fields, section names, order, numbering, and markers. This ensures consistent, high-quality discourse documentation without confusing structural deviations.

How do ownership mapping and accountability validation work for discussion docs?▼

Ownership mapping validation ensures clear ownership responsibilities are documented within the discussion docs. It enforces checks that map accountability according to the SDD standard.

What is the best way to lint discussion documentation before a code review?▼

The best way to lint discussion documentation is applying validation checks to frontmatter, sections, and ownership mapping. This enforces consistent structure and prevents review delays caused by non-standard formatting.

When do I need to use SDD standard validation for markdown files?▼

You need SDD standard validation when discussions fail to adhere to a standardized structure, causing review confusion. It enforces consistent formatting for frontmatter, naming, sections, and ownership responsibilities.