dilution-event-scoring

You can score dilution risk by extracting ATM activity, placement-agent tiers, filing recency, cash runway, and structural toxicity from 10-Q and 424B/8-K filings to calculate an auditable 0–100 score with labeled thresholds.

The best way to compare dilution risk is using a transparent 0–100 scoring model that integrates repeat-dilution counts and structural toxicity signals, allowing consistent ranking over time with fixed SEVERE to MINIMAL thresholds.

ATM detection identifies continuous selling pressure by cross-referencing recent SEC filings, which is then combined with cash runway data and placement-agent tiers to produce a capped weighted component in the overall dilution risk score.

Yes, you can evaluate continuous selling pressure by analyzing the current filing mix and applying lookahead-safe rules with an explicit data-as-of snapshot to ensure reproducible decisions without time leakage.

Detecting structural toxicity requires analyzing warrants, ELOC structures, and discounts from SEC filings, combining these signals with repeat-dilution history to cap weighted components in a comprehensive 0–100 risk score.

Preventing lookahead bias matters because referencing incorrect filings causes time leakage, so an explicit data-as-of snapshot and strict lookahead-safety rules are required to ensure reproducible, auditable dilution risk scoring.