skills.rest
codihaus
codihausCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

dev-review

Review code changes for quality, security, and project standards.

Updated Jan 25, 2026
Search Tags:#workflow#security#quality#best-practices#code-review#pull-request
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/codihaus/claude-skills --skill dev-review-codihaus
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: dev-review
Source: https://github.com/codihaus/claude-skills/tree/main/.claude/skills/dev-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/codihaus/claude-skills --skill dev-review-codihaus

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Code review helps ensure code changes meet quality, security, and standards, reducing defects and risk before merge.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured evaluation of code changes for quality, security, and adherence to project standards.
  • Guided workflow from context gathering to final review, including suggested fixes and positives.
  • Use Case: during PR reviews or post-merge checks to evaluate a feature branch for potential issues.

Quick Start

Run /dev-review on the latest changes to generate a structured evaluation report.

Frequently Asked Questions about dev-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review for pull requests to check quality and security?▼

Automated code review evaluates pull requests for quality, security, and adherence to project standards. It runs guided workflows from context gathering to final evaluation, delivering a structured report with issues, suggested fixes, and positives before merge.

What is the best way to review feature branches for maintainability and risk?▼

Reviewing feature branches for maintainability and risk involves evaluating code changes against project standards. A structured assessment checks conformance and potential issues, generating a guided report that highlights positives and provides actionable suggestions.

How do I evaluate code changes for adherence to project standards before merge?▼

Pre-merge checks evaluate code changes for adherence to project standards, reducing defects and risk. Running a review on the latest feature branch changes generates a structured report detailing issues, suggestions, and positives.

Can I generate a structured code review report with suggested fixes and positives?▼

Structured code review reports include identified issues, suggested fixes, and positives. The evaluation process assesses risk, maintainability, and conformance to project standards, delivering a comprehensive output for developers during pull request reviews.

Does automated code review work for post-merge checks across repositories?▼

Automated code review supports post-merge checks across repositories, evaluating feature branches for potential issues. It assesses quality, security, and standards adherence, producing a structured report with issues, suggestions, and positives.

When do I need a guided workflow for code review instead of manual checks?▼

A guided workflow for code review is needed when evaluating complex code changes for quality, security, and standards. It provides a structured evaluation from context gathering to final report, reducing defects and risk better than manual checks.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
tomas-utomas-u
1

code-review

Analyze code diffs against stories, tests, and coding standards.

Community
Advanced
jankneumannjankneumann
4

cleanup-feature

Merge approved pull requests and archive OpenSpec proposals to finalize features.

Community
Advanced
dr-codedr-code

release-check

Run pre-release verification checks and write a versioned release assessment report.

Community
Advanced
aniruddh2003aniruddh2003
1

speckit.checker

Run static analysis tools to detect security vulnerabilities, type errors, and linting issues.

Community
Intermediate