Deep Research

Synthesize 30–50 sources into credibility-tiered findings with citations.

Updated Jun 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Atrium-Hermes/atrium-lighthouse --skill deep-research-atrium-hermes
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: Deep Research
Source: https://github.com/Atrium-Hermes/atrium-lighthouse/tree/main/skills/deep-research
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Atrium-Hermes/atrium-lighthouse --skill deep-research-atrium-hermes

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Exhaustive, credible synthesis across 30–50 sources in a single session, with explicit source credibility tiering and per-finding confidence.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-source ingestion: ingest diverse sources and classify them as primary, secondary, or tertiary with CRAAP-lite scoring.
  • Evidence-backed findings: each finding includes a confidence level grounded in corroboration across sources, plus a falsifiable claims section.
  • Configurable depth & reuse: supports shallow quick passes or deep investigations for comprehensive reports, memory-enabled context tracking, and structured outputs.
  • Use Case: ideal for literature reviews, research briefs, risk assessments, and topic deep-dives where transparent sourcing matters.

Quick Start

Provide a topic and optional depth (default deep), then request a structured, credibility-focused research report.

Frequently Asked Questions about Deep Research

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I synthesize information from multiple sources into a credibility-tiered research report?▼

Multi-source synthesis ingests 30–50 diverse sources, classifies them as primary, secondary, or tertiary, and applies CRAAP-lite scoring to produce a structured report with explicit per-finding confidence levels and citations.

What is the best way to automate a literature review with transparent source credibility scoring?▼

Automating a literature review uses configurable depth settings to ingest sources and generate evidence-backed findings, complete with corroboration-based confidence levels and a falsifiable claims section for transparent tracking.

Does deep research support quick information synthesis passes instead of full investigations?▼

Deep research supports shallow quick passes alongside full deep investigations, allowing you to configure the depth to get rapid information synthesis or comprehensive reports with memory-enabled context tracking.

Can I use this for risk assessments and topic deep-dives where source classification matters?▼

This is ideal for risk assessments and topic deep-dives because it classifies sources into primary, secondary, and tertiary tiers while applying CRAAP-lite scoring to ensure evidence-backed findings and credible results.

How does evidence-based research handle source credibility and confidence levels?▼

Evidence-based research handles source credibility by classifying 30–50 sources per run and applying CRAAP-lite scoring, grounding each finding's confidence level in corroboration across multiple sources.

What are the limitations of automated research synthesis for complex investigations?▼

Automated research synthesis requires handling 30–50 sources per run and depends on configurable depth settings, meaning shallow passes may lack the corroboration needed for complex investigations requiring high confidence levels.