debate

Coordinate adversarial debate rounds and synthesize a final recommendation.

1|Updated Mar 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/lleontor705/cortex-ia --skill debate-lleontor705
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: debate
Source: https://github.com/lleontor705/cortex-ia/tree/main/internal/assets/skills/debate
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/lleontor705/cortex-ia --skill debate-lleontor705

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Adversarial debate moderator orchestrates competing positions to surface the strongest solution through structured argumentation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Define 2-4 competing positions with clear theses and evaluation criteria.
  • Spawn defender agents for each position and manage three debate rounds: Opening Argument, Rebuttal, Final Defense.
  • Synthesize surviving points into a final recommendation and preserve dissenting perspectives for transparency.
  • Persist debate results for traceability and audit.

Quick Start

Initiate a 2-4 position debate and run all three rounds (Opening Argument, Rebuttal, Final Defense) to produce a synthesis and recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions about debate

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I use adversarial analysis to evaluate competing architecture decisions?▼

Adversarial analysis evaluates competing architecture decisions by spawning dedicated defender agents for each position, running structured rounds of opening arguments, rebuttals, and final defenses to synthesize a final recommendation.

What is structured argumentation for codebase decision-making?▼

Structured argumentation for codebase decision-making is a process where 2-4 competing positions are defined with clear theses and evaluation criteria, then debated across multiple rounds to synthesize a final recommendation.

How do I set up a multi-agent debate for software engineering solutions?▼

To set up a multi-agent debate, define a topic, establish 2-4 competing positions, and provide tooling for p2p messaging and persistence so dedicated defender agents can manage rounds and synthesize results.

Does adversarial debate preserve dissenting perspectives after synthesis?▼

Yes, adversarial debate preserves dissenting perspectives after synthesis. It synthesizes surviving points into a final recommendation while explicitly retaining dissenting viewpoints for transparency and audit.

Can I run an adversarial debate without dedicated defender agents for each position?▼

No, dedicated defender agents for each position are required. The adversarial debate mechanism relies on these agents to independently manage opening arguments, rebuttals, and final defenses before synthesis.