critique

Pressure-test documents for logic gaps, assumptions, and missing perspectives.

12|4|Updated Mar 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mshadmanrahman/pm-pilot --skill critique-mshadmanrahman
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: critique
Source: https://github.com/mshadmanrahman/pm-pilot/tree/main/skills/pm-core/critique
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mshadmanrahman/pm-pilot --skill critique-mshadmanrahman

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Pressure-tests product documents to surface logic gaps, unsupported assumptions, missing perspectives, and completeness issues so authors can strengthen decisions before committing engineering or stakeholder resources.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Six-dimension framework: Evaluates logic, assumptions, evidence, completeness, feasibility, and alternatives to give a structured assessment.
  • Prioritized, actionable feedback: Returns strengths plus critical, important, and minor issues with evidence and suggestions for fixes.
  • Workflow integration: Recommended next steps and cross-references to follow-up skills (e.g., PRD revision, user validation, market research).
  • Use Case: Run a pre-launch review of a Full PRD to identify blockers, missing validations, and the highest-risk assumptions to test.

Quick Start

Ask the critique skill to pressure-test my PRD and return strengths, prioritized issues with evidence, and suggested fixes and validation steps.

Frequently Asked Questions about critique

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I identify logic gaps and unsupported assumptions in a PRD?▼

A document critique evaluates PRDs, RFCs, and proposals for logic gaps, unsupported assumptions, and missing perspectives. It applies a six-dimension framework to produce prioritized, evidence-backed feedback with actionable suggestions and validation steps.

What is the best way to pressure-test an RFC for completeness and feasibility?▼

To review a research synthesis for missing perspectives, apply a six-dimension critique framework focused on logic, assumptions, and completeness. This surfaces critical incompleteness issues and generates actionable suggestions with validation steps.

Can I use automated document review for pre-launch OKR validation?▼

Yes, document critique supports pre-launch OKR validation by evaluating feasibility, assumptions, and completeness. It returns prioritized, evidence-backed issues and recommended next steps to validate high-risk assumptions before committing engineering resources.

Does structured risk analysis work for briefs and product proposals?▼

Structured risk analysis works for product proposals by pressure-testing documents for logic gaps and feasibility issues. It prioritizes critical problems and provides evidence-backed suggestions to fix incomplete assumptions before stakeholder review.

How do I get actionable feedback on missing perspectives in my product brief?▼

Document critique provides actionable feedback on product briefs by identifying missing perspectives and logic gaps across six dimensions. It delivers evidence-backed suggestions and validation steps to strengthen proposals before committing resources.