What problem does it solve? Design reviews are often subjective, inconsistent, and miss systematic issues like AI-generated visual clichés, cognitive overload, and accessibility failures. This Skill provides a structured, repeatable UX evaluation process that combines expert-style design review with deterministic automated detection, producing quantified scores and prioritized fixes instead of vague opinions. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Dual Independent Assessments: Runs an LLM design review (visual hierarchy, cognitive load, emotional journey, AI slop detection) alongside a deterministic CLI/browser-based detector that flags 25 anti-patterns, then synthesizes both into one report. - Quantified Scoring: Scores all 10 Nielsen heuristics on a 0-4 scale with a total out of 40, plus P0-P3 severity tagging for every issue found. - Persona-Based Testing: Walks the primary user flow as 2-3 relevant personas (power user, first-timer, accessibility-dependent, stress tester, mobile user) and reports concrete red flags per persona. - Actionable Follow-Up: Ends with targeted clarifying questions and a prioritized action plan mapping each issue to a specific fix command. - Use Case: After building a new dashboard page, run a critique to get a heuristic scorecard, a list of AI-slop tells detected in your markup, persona-specific failure points, and a ranked list of fixes to apply before shipping. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to critique the design of a specific page or component, for example: critique the checkout page for visual hierarchy, cognitive load, and accessibility issues.