critical-thinking-logical-reasoning

Provide the article, blog, transcript, or report and ask for a critical analysis. The Skill identifies core claims, examines evidence quality, spots logical fallacies, and returns a structured critique with key issues, probing questions, and a bottom-line assessment.

It detects circular reasoning, false dichotomies, appeals to authority or emotion, hasty generalisations, and unsupported leaps. It also surfaces hidden assumptions, missing counter-evidence, and internal contradictions within the argument.

No, this Skill is explicitly scoped to written prose content such as articles, blogs, transcripts, and reports, not code. It evaluates arguments and reasoning rather than programming logic or implementation correctness.

No, it critiques reasoning and logic rather than fact-checking empirical claims, unless a claim is obviously implausible or internally contradictory. The focus is on argument structure, evidence sufficiency, and burden of proof.

The output follows a fixed structure: a one-sentence summary of the core claim and its strength, bulleted key issues with explanations, two to five probing questions for decision-makers, and a one-to-two sentence bottom-line takeaway.