critical-thinking-defense-coach

Pressure-tests research claims using a five-axis Socratic critique framework.

2|1|Updated May 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/BeopsooKim/Research-Bot --skill critical-thinking-defense-coach-beopsookim
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: critical-thinking-defense-coach
Source: https://github.com/BeopsooKim/Research-Bot/tree/main/.agents/skills/critical-thinking-defense-coach
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/BeopsooKim/Research-Bot --skill critical-thinking-defense-coach-beopsookim

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Researchers often become overconfident in their claims, overlook hidden assumptions, or ignore alternative explanations, leaving them unprepared for advisor, committee, or reviewer scrutiny. This Skill stress-tests research claims, interpretations, and conclusions before they face real criticism. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Five-Axis Socratic Critique: Systematically examines data, concepts/theories, point of view, assumptions, and conclusions to expose weak links in a research claim. - Conditional Interventions: Detects authority dependence, unexpected anomalies, and confirmation bias, then applies targeted probing for each pattern. - Reviewer Attack Simulation: Generates hostile but fair reviewer questions and assigns a three-sentence defense homework exercise. - Use Case: A graduate student preparing for a thesis defense submits their central claim, evidence, and assumptions, and receives a structured critique identifying the weakest assumption plus three simulated reviewer attacks to rehearse against. ## Quick Start Ask the coach to act as a skeptical reviewer and pressure-test your research claim by providing your claim, evidence, and assumptions.

Frequently Asked Questions about critical-thinking-defense-coach

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I prepare for a thesis or paper defense against tough reviewers?▼

Submit your claim, evidence, and assumptions, and the Skill generates three hostile but fair reviewer questions plus a defense homework exercise. It rewrites your claim precisely and identifies the weakest link so you can rehearse targeted responses.

How can I test whether my research conclusion is actually supported?▼

The Skill applies a five-axis critique covering data, concepts and theories, point of view, assumptions, and conclusions. It checks whether conclusions logically follow from evidence and flags speculation presented as fact.

Does this Skill support Korean-language research advising?▼

Yes, it detects Korean input and responds in Korean with essential English terms in parentheses on first use. It preserves equations, units, variable names, and citations in their original form while explaining reasoning in Korean.

What should I do when my experiment produces unexpected anomalies?▼

The Skill prevents premature discarding of anomalies and asks what would need revision if the anomaly is real. It requires a test that distinguishes model error from genuinely new physical insight.

When should I not use a critical thinking coach for research?▼

Do not use it when the main task is implementation, data cleaning, or citation search, since specialized skills fit those better. It also refuses to help fabricate evidence, hide anomalies, or bypass research-integrity requirements.