craft-critique

Reviews designs, copy, and plans with evidence-based critique and verdicts.

1|Updated Jul 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/dineshrevunuru/SuperSkills --skill craft-critique-dineshrevunuru
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: craft-critique
Source: https://github.com/dineshrevunuru/SuperSkills/tree/main/craft-critique
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/dineshrevunuru/SuperSkills --skill craft-critique-dineshrevunuru

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Reviews of design work, copy, and plans often default to vague affirmation or unsupported claims, letting weak work ship. This Skill enforces an evidence-disciplined critique standard that produces a clear verdict and one prioritized recommendation every time. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Evidence-Discipline Protocol: Every external claim about markets, users, or metrics must be cited, researched, or explicitly flagged as under-evidenced. - Structured Critique Framework: Evaluates first impression, usability, hierarchy, consistency, accessibility, and claim honesty, with severity ratings and a PASS / PASS WITH NOTES / BLOCKED verdict. - Stress-Test (Grilling) Mode: Interrogates plans and positioning before they are built, one question at a time, each with a recommended answer, separating discoverable facts from owner-only decisions. - Use Case: Before shipping a portfolio case study, run a critique to flag unverifiable metrics, accessibility issues, and generic copy, then receive a BLOCKED verdict with the shortest path to unblock. ## Quick Start Ask the AI to critique your design, case study, or plan using the craft-critique standard and return a verdict with prioritized findings.

Frequently Asked Questions about craft-critique

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I critique a design before shipping it?▼

Run the work through the six-dimension critique framework: first impression, usability, hierarchy, consistency, accessibility, and claim honesty. Each finding gets a severity rating, and the review ends with a PASS, PASS WITH NOTES, or BLOCKED verdict plus one prioritized fix.

How do I stress-test a plan or positioning before building it?▼

Use grilling mode, which interrogates the plan one question at a time, each with a recommended answer. Facts that can be looked up are resolved directly, while decisions only the owner can make are surfaced individually until every branch resolves.

How do I audit AI-generated content for inflated claims?▼

Apply the four AI-output scans: inflation scan for superlatives, fabrication scan verifying every number and citation, generic-content scan for filler that could apply to anyone, and sycophancy scan for reviews that find no problems.

What is the evidence-discipline protocol for reviewing claims?▼

Any claim about external reality must be cited with a checkable source, researched directly, or explicitly flagged as under-evidenced with what data would strengthen it. Confident claims synthesized from internal context alone are banned.

When should I use critique mode versus grilling mode?▼

Use the critique framework for finished artifacts like designs, copy, or case studies. Use grilling for plans and positioning before they are built, when reversing the decision would be expensive.