What problem does it solve? Single-agent answers carry one frame and its blind spots, and asking for pros and cons yields a flat list nobody defends. This Skill convenes a panel of custom-briefed agents that genuinely disagree, challenge each other's actual points across rounds, and produce a visible transcript plus synthesis for better decisions. ## Core Features & Use Cases - DEBATE Workflow: Runs a full three-round structured debate (initial positions, responses and challenges, synthesis) with four parallel agents per round, completing in roughly 40-90 seconds. - QUICK Workflow: Gathers single-round perspectives from four briefed members in 15-30 seconds for fast sanity checks, with escalation guidance to a full debate. - Inline Member Briefs: Writes topic-specific personas (name, role, stance, attack angle) launched via general-purpose subagents, covering builder, skeptic, pragmatist, and analyst slots by default. - Use Case: Ask "Should we use WebSockets or SSE?" and receive a three-round transcript where a real-time architect, frontend-DX advocate, ops skeptic, and researcher challenge each other, ending in convergence points, remaining disagreements, and a recommended path. ## Quick Start Ask the agent to run a council debate on whether your team should adopt WebSockets or SSE for real-time updates.