council

Runs a five-lens adversarial advisory review with blind peer review and chairman synthesis.

4|Updated Jun 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/laicluse/agent-fieldkit --skill council-laicluse
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: council
Source: https://github.com/laicluse/agent-fieldkit/tree/main/.agents/plugins/generated/gurus/skills/council
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/laicluse/agent-fieldkit --skill council-laicluse

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? LLM assistants tend to be agreeable by default, so ideas, decisions, and plans often go untested against genuinely critical perspectives. This Skill counteracts sycophancy by subjecting a brief to five adversarial advisor lenses, blind peer review, and a chairman synthesis that produces one actionable verdict. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Five adversarial lenses: Pre-mortem, First-principles, Opportunity-finder, Stranger, and Action advisors each critique the same brief from a deliberately conflicting angle. - Anonymized blind peer review: Reviews are shuffled to letters A-E and each advisor ranks the other four, preventing hierarchy bias between lenses. - Chairman synthesis: A final pass identifies convergence, divergence, a decisive verdict, and one concrete next step. - Use Case: Before committing to a risky architecture migration, run the council to surface hidden failure modes, naive outsider questions, and a concrete Monday-morning action. ## Quick Start Ask the agent to run the council skill on your decision or plan, for example by saying: run a council review on my plan to rewrite the billing service in Rust.

Frequently Asked Questions about council

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a multi-perspective review of a decision with an AI agent?▼

Invoke the council skill with a neutral three-sentence brief describing your decision or plan. It dispatches five advisor lenses in parallel, runs anonymized peer review, and returns a chairman verdict with a concrete next step.

What are the five advisor lenses in the council review?▼

The lenses are Pre-mortem (assumes failure), First-principles (rebuilds from scratch), Opportunity-finder (seeks bigger upside), Stranger (zero-context naive questions), and Action (demands a concrete step this week).

When should I not use the council skill?▼

Skip it for code review, which belongs to a software review skill, and for purely factual questions, which belong to grounding or research skills. It is also overkill for quick sanity checks given its eleven advisor jobs per run.

Does the council skill work without subagent support?▼

Yes. When no native subagent facility is available, it runs the same protocol as clearly separated single-session passes and states that fallback in the final review, though the phases run serially instead of in parallel.

Why does the council anonymize reviews before peer review?▼

Anonymization prevents hierarchy bias, where advisors defer to a lens by name rather than judging content. Each advisor sees only four letter-labeled reviews with their own excluded, then ranks them blindly.