council

Dispatches parallel blind subagents embodying personas and diffs their structured verdicts into a disagreement map.

1|Updated Jun 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/kridaydave/My_Skills --skill council-kridaydave
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: council
Source: https://github.com/kridaydave/My_Skills/tree/main/council
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/kridaydave/My_Skills --skill council-kridaydave

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? High-stakes decisions suffer when a single perspective misses risks, and group discussion can collapse into groupthink. This Skill polls multiple expert personas as isolated parallel subagents so their independent answers reveal exactly where a decision is contested and where it is safe. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Blind Parallel Panel: Spawns 3-5 persona subagents in one batch via the Agent tool, each answering in isolation with no sight of the others. - Structured Verdicts: Forces every panelist to return the same schema (position, confidence, key reason, top risk, what would change my mind) so answers can be diffed mechanically. - Disagreement Map Synthesis: Aligns answers field-by-field to surface settled points, the axis of disagreement, lone dissenters, a confidence read, and the decisive question that would resolve the split. - Use Case: Before committing to a new architecture, convene Atlas, Forge, and Anchor blind; if Atlas flags scaling risk while Forge sees none, you know exactly which fact to verify before committing. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to convene the council on whether your team should adopt a specific technology, naming the personas you want on the panel.

Frequently Asked Questions about council

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get multiple AI personas to review one decision?▼

Invoke the council with your question and optionally name the panel. It spawns each persona as a separate subagent in one parallel batch, each answering blind, then synthesizes their structured verdicts into an agreement and disagreement map.

What is the difference between council and debate for decision review?▼

Debate runs two personas arguing inside one shared context, so framing can contaminate both sides. Council spawns N isolated subagents that never see each other, making their agreement or disagreement an uncontaminated signal.

How many personas should be on a decision panel?▼

Three to five personas is the recommended range. Fewer than three reduces to a debate, while more than about six adds cost with diminishing signal since every panelist is a full subagent.

When should I not use a multi-persona panel review?▼

Skip it for questions with a known right answer, trivial or easily reversible decisions, and tasks requiring execution rather than judgment. Council answers a question; it does not write code or run evaluations.

Why must panel subagents be blind to each other?▼

Blindness prevents one persona's framing from infecting the others, which would manufacture false consensus. Independent answers reached in isolation make genuine convergence meaningful and expose the true axis of disagreement.