coordinator-test-workflow

Orchestrates experimental case-worker routing for repository assessment, direct fixes, and Plan authoring.

Updated Mar 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/skyrocoster/dnd-kids-resources --skill coordinator-test-workflow-skyrocoster
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: coordinator-test-workflow
Source: https://github.com/skyrocoster/dnd-kids-resources/tree/main/.opencode/skills/coordinator-test-workflow
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/skyrocoster/dnd-kids-resources --skill coordinator-test-workflow-skyrocoster

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? It defines a controlled experimental workflow for routing free-form repository requests through assessment, direct execution, Plan review, and order authoring without wasting frontier context on routine retrieval. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Case Assessment Routing: Spawns a case-worker to classify requests as DIRECT-CANDIDATE, PLAN-CANDIDATE, MASTER-PLAN-CANDIDATE, QUESTION, NO-PROBLEM, or BLOCKED. - Direct Fix Execution: Approves atomic changes with exact authorized paths, proof contracts, and escalation boundaries, then resumes the same task ID for execution. - Plan Review and Authoring: Reviews Plan proposals for coherent stages, exclusions, and proof quality, then writes focused Plans and authors Luna orders in warm or fresh context modes. - Use Case: A user submits a free-form repository change request; the coordinator assesses it, approves a direct route with exact paths and a proof contract, and validates the fix through an independent validator. ## Quick Start Ask the coordinator to assess and route a repository change request through the experimental case-worker workflow.

Frequently Asked Questions about coordinator-test-workflow

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I route a repository change request through a coordinator workflow?▼

Spawn the case-worker with a PHASE: ASSESS handoff containing the verbatim request and simulation path. The case-worker returns a route classification such as DIRECT-CANDIDATE or PLAN-CANDIDATE, which the coordinator reviews before approving execution.

What is the difference between a direct candidate and a Plan candidate?▼

A direct candidate is one atomic change with settled behavior, exact paths, and a single proof contract. A Plan candidate involves multiple coherent stages, explicit exclusions, and compiler evidence requiring a written Plan before any implementation.

When should I use warm versus fresh Luna context for order authoring?▼

Use warm mode to resume the retained case-worker session when paid-for Plan and repository context can be reused. Use fresh mode to launch a new session with only the frontier-reviewed compile packet, excluding transcripts and discovery narrative.

What are the limitations of this experimental workflow?▼

The experiment does not support MASTER-PLAN-CANDIDATE implementation, ordered execution after materialization, auto-commits, or Plan reconciliation. Validation repair is limited to one cycle, and escalated quick stages become ordered and stop the flow.

Why does a direct route get rejected during review?▼

Rejection occurs when the candidate lacks exact paths, settled behavior, structural evidence, or a focused proof contract, or when it hides contract, design, data, or migration decisions. Under-routed candidates are rejected without the coordinator exploring source directly.