control-framework-mapping

Map controls across security frameworks to generate coverage and gap analyses.

1|Updated Nov 29, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/SSiertsema/claude-code-plugins --skill control-framework-mapping
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: control-framework-mapping
Source: https://github.com/SSiertsema/claude-code-plugins/tree/main/control-framework-mapping/skills/control-framework-mapping
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/SSiertsema/claude-code-plugins --skill control-framework-mapping

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Consolidates and maps controls across multiple security frameworks to avoid duplicate work and support evidence-based assessments.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Framework coverage & gap analysis: generate per-framework mappings, surface missing controls, and reveal cross-framework coverage.
  • Evidence-driven mapping: reference real control IDs with supporting evidence types, not fabricated claims.
  • Maturity and reporting: provide a maturity view and export consolidated reports for audits and governance.
  • Diagram rendering: produce Mermaid diagrams with optional PNG exports to visualize coverage.

Use cases include mapping ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIST CSF, and NIST 800-53 within a single inventory; performing gap analyses to prepare for external audits; consolidating controls to reduce duplication across frameworks.

Quick Start

Define the scope and target frameworks, then run the mapping to generate a unified control inventory with evidence-backed mappings.

Frequently Asked Questions about control-framework-mapping

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I map controls across multiple security frameworks like ISO 27001 and SOC 2?▼

Cross-framework control mapping consolidates overlapping requirements from ISO 27001, SOC 2, and NIST CSF into a single inventory. It identifies gaps, references real control IDs, and links supporting evidence to eliminate duplicate audit work across multiple standards.

What is the best way to perform a gap analysis for NIST 800-53 and PCI-DSS compliance?▼

The best way to perform a gap analysis for NIST 800-53 and PCI-DSS is to apply scoping against target frameworks to generate per-framework coverage reports, surface missing controls, and map evidence types to ensure readiness for external audits.

Can I use evidence-driven control mapping to prepare for HIPAA Security Rule audits?▼

Yes, evidence-driven control mapping applies to the HIPAA Security Rule by referencing real control IDs with supporting evidence types rather than fabricated claims, generating per-framework coverage and maturity scoring to support audit readiness.

Does cross-framework control consolidation support maturity scoring and diagram exports?▼

Cross-framework control consolidation supports maturity scoring and diagram exports by providing a maturity view of your unified inventory and rendering Mermaid diagrams with optional PNG exports to visualize framework coverage gaps.

When do I need unified control framework mapping for risk management?▼

You need unified control framework mapping for risk management when consolidating multiple frameworks like NIS2, CIS Controls, and NIST CSF to avoid duplicate work, reveal cross-framework coverage, and support evidence-based governance assessments.