contract-flags

Flags risky contract clauses against a checklist in a dated findings table.

Updated Sep 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/JYeswak/grok_bot_playground --skill contract-flags-jyeswak
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: contract-flags
Source: https://github.com/JYeswak/grok_bot_playground/tree/main/plugin/skills/contract-flags
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/JYeswak/grok_bot_playground --skill contract-flags-jyeswak

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Early contract review is slow and inconsistent when done by hand, and non-lawyers often miss clauses that deserve a second look before signing. This Skill turns a contract draft into a structured, dated findings table so a human can ask better questions of qualified counsel. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Checklist-Based Flagging: Walks the owner's plain-language watch list (termination notice, payment terms, liability wording) and quotes each matching clause with a section reference. - Version Comparison: Compares two drafts or counterparties' papers, naming added, removed, and reworded clauses with quotes both ways. - Counsel-Ready Output: Ranks flags by checklist priority and ends with the top three questions for counsel, framed strictly as questions rather than legal verdicts. - Use Case: A founder receives a revised vendor agreement and pastes both versions; the Skill produces a dated table of changed liability and termination clauses with questions to bring to their lawyer. ## Quick Start Review these two contract drafts against my checklist of termination, payment, and liability terms and produce a flagged findings table with questions for my counsel.

Frequently Asked Questions about contract-flags

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a contract draft for risky clauses?▼

Provide the contract text plus a plain-language checklist of terms to watch, such as termination notice or liability wording. The Skill quotes each matching clause with a section reference and frames a question for counsel on every flag.

How to compare two versions of a contract?▼

Supply both dated versions and the Skill names added, removed, and reworded clauses with section references. Reworded clauses are quoted both ways so changes are visible verbatim rather than paraphrased.

Can AI contract review replace a lawyer?▼

No. This Skill produces read-only flags framed as questions for qualified counsel and never issues verdicts on enforceability, compliance, or whether to sign. Every findings table carries a not-legal-advice notice.

What inputs does contract clause flagging need?▼

At least two dated contract inputs (two drafts, versions, or counterparties' papers) plus the owner's checklist and the intended reader of the findings. A single draft is marked preliminary.

What are the limitations of checklist-based contract review?▼

It only flags patterns named in the owner's checklist and cannot invent legal standards or judge enforceability. It never rewrites clauses, approves language, or authorizes signatures, which remain with qualified counsel and the owner.