content-quality-auditor

Audits content artifacts against an 80-item CORE-EEAT rubric with evidence-linked scores and publish verdicts.

Updated Jul 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/qaz26688442/bo-car --skill content-quality-auditor-qaz26688442
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: content-quality-auditor
Source: https://github.com/qaz26688442/bo-car/tree/main/.agents/skills/content-quality-auditor
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/qaz26688442/bo-car --skill content-quality-auditor-qaz26688442

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Before publishing, teams need an objective, evidence-based assessment of whether a piece of content meets E-E-A-T quality standards. This Skill replaces subjective review with a typed 80-item CORE-EEAT audit that produces evidence-linked item states, explicit evidence gaps, veto checks, and a SHIP/FIX/BLOCK/UNDECIDED verdict. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Typed 80-item CORE-EEAT audit: Evaluates Content, Organization, Research, Exclusivity, Experience, Expertise, Authority, and Trust dimensions with per-item Pass/Partial/Fail/Unknown states tied to evidence. - Veto and scoring gates: Detects material title mismatch (C01), factual contradiction (R10), and missing disclosure (T04) vetoes, and only reports a comparable score when evidence coverage is complete. - Prioritized fix plan and handoff: Orders findings by severity and points lost, then routes fixes to content, technical SEO, or domain authority skills. - Use Case: Before publishing a product review for the U.S. market, run the audit to confirm disclosure compliance, evidence coverage, and receive a FIX verdict listing exactly which items need remediation. ## Quick Start Audit this product review for the U.S. market before publication and show every evidence gap: <URL or pasted content>.

Frequently Asked Questions about content-quality-auditor

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit content quality and E-E-A-T before publishing?▼

Provide a URL or pasted draft plus the content type and target market. The audit evaluates all 80 CORE-EEAT items with evidence-linked Pass/Partial/Fail/Unknown states and returns a score with a SHIP, FIX, BLOCK, or UNDECIDED verdict.

What content types does the CORE-EEAT audit support?▼

It supports nine typed profiles: product-review, how-to-guide, comparison, landing-page, blog-post, faq-page, alternative, best-of, and testimonial. Each profile applies its own dimension weighting, so the content type must be declared before scoring.

When should I use this instead of an on-page SEO checker?▼

Use this audit for content quality, E-E-A-T, and publish-readiness decisions on a full artifact. Use an on-page SEO checker for narrow structural checks like tags and headers, and a domain authority auditor for domain-level trust and citation signals.

Why does the audit return UNDECIDED with no score?▼

A score is only reported when evidence coverage is complete. If applicable items cannot be observed, they are marked unknown, the verdict becomes NEEDS_INPUT/UNDECIDED, and the exact evidence gaps are listed instead of inventing a score.

What triggers a BLOCK verdict in a content audit?▼

Two or more verified vetoes trigger BLOCK: material title-promise mismatch (C01), material internal factual contradiction (R10), or a missing disclosure when a material connection exists (T04). A single veto caps the final score at 59 with a FIX verdict.