content-copy-critical-writing

Classify each major claim by evidence strength before drafting: verified fact, strong source, limited signal, reasoned hypothesis, or unsupported. Use calibrated language such as "suggests" for limited evidence and reserve "shows" for strong evidence, then state the boundaries of each claim.

Use Review mode to get findings ordered by severity in the format [HIGH|MED|LOW] passage, flaw name, why it weakens the piece, and a specific fix. The audit checks narrative fallacy, over-generalization, just-so storytelling, false equivalency, hidden ideology, and intellectual smugness.

Draft produces finished content from a brief, Edit returns revised prose with concise change notes, Review delivers severity-ranked critique with rubric scores, and Shape outputs a thesis, reader turn, evidence plan, and outline before any drafting begins.

Route grammar-only edits, tone polish, and AI-tell cleanup to clear-writing or humanizer skills instead. Brand messaging, conversion copy, executive communications, and viral hooks also fall outside this skill's analytical scope.

No. The skill explicitly refuses to mimic any named living writer's signature phrasing or persona. It converts such requests into neutral craft traits like scale analogies, character-led explanation, conversational wit, and practical takeaways.