content-analysis

Provide the source text or transcript and request an analysis. The workflow maps the central question, breaks content into major claims, attaches supporting evidence to each claim, and evaluates whether the evidence actually supports the conclusions.

Use the transcript of the video or podcast as the source. The skill checks transcript coverage and speaker labels first, then applies the media lens covering speaker roles, sequence, emphasis, and transcript reliability.

Yes, the comparative lens identifies agreement, conflict, and differences in assumptions across sources. Each disputed point is attributed to the specific source that supports it.

The analysis states the exact boundary of what could be inspected, such as paywalls, missing sections, or partial transcripts. If a source cannot be opened at all, the skill requests the text instead of presenting a fabricated analysis.

Analysis quality depends on source completeness and extraction accuracy. Promotional claims and anecdotes are treated as limited evidence, and deductions are labeled as analysis rather than source claims to avoid overstating conclusions.