conflict-resolver

Resolve merge conflicts in files produced by parallel Executor tasks.

Updated Jul 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/primax79/ai-architect-executor --skill conflict-resolver-primax79
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: conflict-resolver
Source: https://github.com/primax79/ai-architect-executor/tree/main/plugins/architect-side/skills/conflict-resolver
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/primax79/ai-architect-executor --skill conflict-resolver-primax79

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? When multiple delegated coding tasks run in parallel worktrees, merging their outputs back together produces Git conflict markers that must be resolved without losing the intent of either parallel feature. Manual resolution is error-prone and can silently break one of the merged changes. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Conflict Detection: Scans the current working directory to find every file containing conflict markers (<<<<<<< HEAD). - Semantic Merging: Analyzes both conflicting versions logically and integrates them so the semantics of both parallel features are preserved, rather than picking one side. - Verification: Runs the linter and/or a basic build after resolution to confirm the merged code did not break syntax. - Use Case: After dispatching two Executor tasks in parallel git worktrees, merging their branches produces conflicts in shared files; this skill resolves each conflict while keeping both features intact and validates the result with a build. ## Quick Start Resolve all merge conflicts in the current working directory left by the parallel Executor tasks, preserving both features, then run the linter to verify.

Frequently Asked Questions about conflict-resolver

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I resolve merge conflicts from parallel git worktrees?▼

Find every file containing conflict markers (`<<<<<<< HEAD`) in the working directory, analyze both versions logically, and edit the files to integrate both changes so each parallel feature's semantics are preserved. Then run the linter or a basic build to confirm nothing broke.

How to merge parallel AI coding agent outputs without losing changes?▼

Treat each conflicting hunk as two feature intents rather than a choice between sides. Remove the markers and integrate the code so both delegated tasks' behavior survives, then verify with a build or lint pass.

Does this conflict resolution approach work with any programming language?▼

Yes, the process is language-agnostic: it operates on textual conflict markers in any file and relies on logical analysis of both versions. Verification uses whatever linter or build tool the project already has.

Why does a merge conflict resolution still break the build?▼

A resolution can be syntactically clean but semantically wrong, such as duplicated declarations or incompatible logic from the two parallel features. Running the linter and a basic build after editing catches these failures before the merge is accepted.

When should I not auto-resolve merge conflicts this way?▼

Avoid it when the two parallel tasks made contradictory design decisions that cannot coexist semantically, or when conflicts span generated files that should be regenerated instead. Those cases need Architect-level review rather than mechanical merging.