What problem does it solve? Legal analysis under Chinese statutory law frequently encounters competing applicable statutes, contradictory evidence, and multiple disputed issues that must be ordered logically. This Skill provides a structured decision framework for resolving these three conflict types so that legal reasoning conclusions rest on correct rule selection, sound fact-finding, and efficient issue sequencing. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Statutory Conflict Resolution (法条竞合): Applies hierarchy rules (superior law over inferior law), special-law-over-general-law, new-law-over-old-law, and request-right concurrence analysis with side-by-side comparisons of elements, remedies, and limitation periods. - Evidence Contradiction Resolution (证据矛盾): Filters evidence admissibility first, then compares probative force under statutory rules, and applies the correct burden of proof standard (civil, criminal, or administrative) when evidence is evenly balanced. - Issue Prioritization (争点排序): Builds dependency graphs of disputed issues, orders procedural and threshold issues first, and identifies short-circuit paths that eliminate downstream issues. - Use Case: In a construction dispute involving an unqualified contractor, two conflicting quality inspection reports, and six disputed issues, the Skill sequences the issues, determines the contract is void but payable under the judicial interpretation's special rule, and recommends judicial appraisal to break the evidentiary tie. ## Quick Start Analyze this case where both the Civil Code and the Consumer Protection Law seem to apply, identify the conflict type, and produce a resolution report with confidence levels.
