compliance-audit

Maps regulatory controls to evidence and identifies MET, PARTIAL, or GAP statuses.

Updated Apr 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/hpsgd/turtlestack --skill compliance-audit-hpsgd
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: compliance-audit
Source: https://github.com/hpsgd/turtlestack/tree/main/plugins/leadership/grc-lead/skills/compliance-audit
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/hpsgd/turtlestack --skill compliance-audit-hpsgd

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Audit compliance against regulatory frameworks by identifying gaps, collecting evidence, and planning remediation in a structured, repeatable manner.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Framework identification and scoping for regulatory audits (GDPR, SOC 2, ISO 27001, etc.)
  • Evidence collection, evidence mapping to controls, and status tracking (MET/PARTIAL/GAP)
  • Remediation planning, risk ranking, and audit reporting across systems and processes
  • Use Case: Compliance teams map controls, collect evidence, and generate remediation plans to maintain certifications and regulatory readiness.

Quick Start

Initiate an audit by selecting a framework, scope, and data sources, then run Compliance Audit to generate a gap report.

Frequently Asked Questions about compliance-audit

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct a regulatory compliance audit and identify gaps in my controls?▼

A regulatory compliance audit identifies applicable frameworks and maps existing policies and configurations to controls, determining MET, PARTIAL, or GAP statuses to produce a structured evidence plan and remediation priorities.

What is control mapping and how does it work for frameworks like GDPR and SOC 2?▼

Control mapping for frameworks like GDPR and SOC 2 connects existing policies and system configurations to specific regulatory requirements, evaluating evidence to determine if control statuses are MET, PARTIAL, or GAP.

Can I use this approach to audit compliance across multiple systems and processes?▼

Yes, compliance audits map controls and collect evidence across multiple systems and processes in scope, generating a structured gap report and remediation priorities for risk management workflows.

What's the best way to plan remediation after finding compliance gaps?▼

The best way to plan remediation for compliance gaps is to produce a structured evidence plan that risk-ranks identified deficiencies, prioritizing remediation actions for integration into risk management workflows.

Do I need existing policies and configurations to start a regulatory audit?▼

Yes, a regulatory audit requires existing policies, configurations, and evidence across in-scope systems to map against applicable regulatory framework controls and accurately determine MET, PARTIAL, or GAP statuses.