compare-masters

Produce citation-backed comparative analyses of Buddhist masters, schools, doctrines with CBETA citations and divergence mapping.

199|43|Updated Apr 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tradecatlabs/fatecat --skill compare-masters-tradecatlabs
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: compare-masters
Source: https://github.com/tradecatlabs/fatecat/tree/main/tools/reference-repos/github/Master-skill-main/prebuilt/compare
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tradecatlabs/fatecat --skill compare-masters-tradecatlabs

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps users compare multiple Buddhist masters, schools, and perspectives in a structured way without collapsing different traditions into a single answer. It is designed to prevent sectarian ranking, fabricated dialogue, and unsupported doctrinal claims while still giving a useful side-by-side analysis.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-master comparison: Selects the most relevant 2-3 masters based on topic, explicit user preference, or classic doctrinal pairings.
  • Evidence-backed responses: Requires CBETA citations for every doctrinal claim and organizes answers around the cited sources.
  • Difference mapping: Produces a five-dimensional divergence radar, labeled disagreement types, shared ground, and historical background.
  • Safety guardrails: Blocks rankings, invented conversations, esoteric step-by-step instructions, and attainment judgments.
  • Use Case: A user asks how Zen and Pure Land differ, and the Skill returns a balanced comparison with citations, differences, common ground, and follow-up questions.

Quick Start

Ask for a cited comparison of two or three Buddhist masters on your topic, and specify any masters you want included.

Frequently Asked Questions about compare-masters

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I compare Buddhist masters without sectarian bias or fabricated dialogue?▼

To compare Buddhist masters without bias, you produce citation-backed doctrinal analyses while preventing rankings and unsupported claims. The system selects 2-3 relevant masters based on topic or classic doctrinal pairings.

What is the best way to compare Zen and Pure Land doctrinal differences?▼

The best way to compare Zen and Pure Land differences is generating a five-dimensional divergence radar with CBETA citations. This maps labeled disagreement types, shared ground, and historical background side-by-side.

Can I use CBETA citations for sectarian studies across Tibetan and Theravada traditions?▼

Yes, you can use CBETA citations for sectarian studies across Chinese, Tibetan, and Theravada traditions. Evidence-backed responses organize answers around cited sources to prevent unsupported doctrinal claims.

How do I map meditation approaches across different Buddhist schools?▼

To map meditation approaches across Buddhist schools, apply structured divergence analysis to historical contrasts. This yields a balanced comparison with differences, common ground, and follow-up questions.

What are the limitations of comparing Buddhist masters using automated doctrinal analysis?▼

Limitations of doctrinal analysis include safety guardrails that block attainment judgments and esoteric step-by-step instructions. It prevents sectarian ranking and invented conversations to avoid biased or fabricated comparisons.