skills.rest
YuriiYInno
YuriiYInnoCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

code-reviewer

Review code for quality, security, performance, and accessibility issues with structured severity-ranked feedback.

Updated Oct 2, 2025
Search Tags:#code quality#typescript#code review#pull request#accessibility#security#wcag
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/YuriiYInno/Innogram --skill code-reviewer-yuriiyinno
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/YuriiYInno/Innogram/tree/main/.codex/skills/code-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/YuriiYInno/Innogram --skill code-reviewer-yuriiyinno

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Manually reviewing pull requests and code changes for quality, security, performance, and accessibility issues is time-consuming and inconsistent. This Skill provides a systematic checklist-driven review process that produces structured, severity-ranked feedback. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Multi-Category Review Checklists: Covers architecture compliance, code quality, TypeScript best practices, security, performance, and testing in one pass. - Frontend & Accessibility Review: Fetches web interface guidelines and applies WCAG 2.2 Level AA rules when reviewing React, Vue, or Angular UI code. - Structured Severity Output: Classifies findings as Critical, Major, or Minor with file and line references, plus positive notes. - Use Case: After a teammate opens a pull request on a NestJS microservice, run a review to catch N+1 queries, missing input validation, and accessibility violations before merge. ## Quick Start Ask the AI to review the code in your current pull request or changed files for quality, security, and accessibility issues.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a pull request for code quality issues?▼

Run a structured review covering architecture compliance, naming, error handling, security, and performance. Findings are grouped by severity (Critical, Major, Minor) with file and line references so authors can prioritize fixes.

What security issues does a code review check for?▼

The review checks for missing input validation, hardcoded secrets, absent authorization checks, SQL injection via unparameterized queries, and XSS from unencoded output. These map to the most common web application vulnerability classes.

Does this code review check accessibility for React components?▼

Yes. When reviewing frontend code, it applies WCAG 2.2 Level AA rules covering semantic HTML, keyboard accessibility, ARIA usage, color contrast, forms, and motion, plus web interface guidelines fetched from the vercel-labs repository.

What TypeScript best practices are checked during review?▼

The review flags any-type usage, missing interfaces for object shapes, absent explicit return types on public methods, improper null/undefined handling, and incorrect readonly usage.

When should I not rely on an automated code review checklist?▼

Checklist-based review cannot judge business logic correctness against unstated requirements or replace domain-expert judgment. Use it as a first pass, then involve teammates familiar with the affected subsystem for final approval.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
sjevsjev
1

feature-review

Review feature branch changes against base branch and feature specifications.

Community
Advanced
auerbachbauerbachb
3

fixpr

Audit GitHub PR threads, CI checks, and merge blockers, then fix issues and resolve threads via GraphQL.

Community
Advanced
ollieb89ollieb89

lint-and-validate

Run Ruff, ESLint, mypy, and Bandit checks on Python and Node.js projects.

Community
Intermediate
y1feng200156y1feng200156
33

vuln-scan

Scan project dependencies for known security vulnerabilities using Safety CLI and OSV-Scanner.

Community
Intermediate