code-reviewer

Review pull requests for bugs, security vulnerabilities, and design issues.

105|16|Updated Jan 18, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jordanhubbard/loom --skill code-reviewer-jordanhubbard
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/jordanhubbard/loom/tree/main/personas/default/code-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jordanhubbard/loom --skill code-reviewer-jordanhubbard

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Reduces the risk of defective software by enabling automated, security-aware reviews that catch bugs, vulnerabilities, and design gaps before code ships.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Critical code analysis for correctness, security, performance, and readability.
  • Enforcement of coding standards and best practices with concrete, actionable feedback.
  • Use Case: during a PR, identifies a race condition or vulnerable input handling and suggests concrete remediation.

Quick Start

Provide a short, precise code review for the latest PR, focusing on correctness, security, and design.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I catch race conditions and security vulnerabilities during a pull request review?▼

Automated code review identifies race conditions and security vulnerabilities during a pull request by analyzing correctness and design, delivering structured feedback with rationale and suggested fixes to ensure post-merge quality.

What is the best way to enforce coding standards and best practices across multi-language repositories?▼

Enforcing coding standards across multi-language repositories requires automated code analysis that checks for inconsistent API usage and inadequate input validation, providing concrete actionable feedback to maintain code quality before merge.

Can I get design feedback and design issue identification before merging code?▼

Design feedback is generated before merge by applying critical code analysis to performance, readability, and design gaps, supplying rationale and follow-up checks to ensure post-merge quality.

Does automated code review work for spotting inadequate input validation and inconsistent API usage?▼

Automated code review works for spotting inadequate input validation and inconsistent API usage by applying security-aware analysis to pull requests, delivering structured feedback including suggested fixes and follow-up checks.

What limitations should I expect from automated security-aware code analysis?▼

Automated security-aware code analysis focuses on correctness, security, performance, and readability but requires a short, precise prompt for the latest PR to deliver structured feedback effectively without replacing human review.