What problem does it solve? Code reviews are inconsistent when reviewers rely on memory alone, missing security issues, correctness bugs, or violations of team style standards. This Skill provides a structured checklist that applies the repository's own code-style rules plus general correctness and security checks to every diff or pull request. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Standards-based review: Applies the checks from rules/code-style.md, including Boy Scout Principle, SOLID, YAGNI, DRY, and testability. - Correctness and security checklist: Catches boundary errors, swallowed exceptions, injection risks, hardcoded secrets, race conditions, and missing test coverage. - Severity-ranked output: Reports findings grouped into Must fix, Should consider, and Nit sections with file and line references. - Use Case: Before merging a pull request, run this Skill on the PR diff to get a ranked list of issues, such as an unparameterized SQL query flagged as Must fix and a premature abstraction flagged as Should consider. ## Quick Start Review the current git diff against the repository code-style rules and report any correctness or security findings ranked by severity.