What problem does it solve? Spec-driven development pipelines drift when code, specifications, plans, and tests are reviewed ad hoc. This Skill enforces a consistent, evidence-based review process that checks every artefact against the constitution and spec set, so discrepancies are caught with concrete file-and-line evidence instead of subjective opinion. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Three review modes: Run a documentation review (Product Owner role, pre-implementation), a code review (Implementation Engineer role, post-implementation), or a test review (test pyramid and coverage quality), each with its own companion workflow document. - Constitution-first analysis: Every finding cites the constitution rule or spec requirement identifier it violates, plus a workspace-relative path and line range. - Structured reports with decision checklists: Each mode produces a fixed output structure including severity-ranked findings, Proposed Resolutions (Options A/B/C), and an explicit approval checklist. - Use Case: After implementing a feature from specs/004-create-order/, run the code-type review to detect an idempotency behaviour present in code but missing from the spec, then decide via the checklist whether to align code or amend the spec. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to run the code-review skill with type code, documentation, or test for the current feature spec folder.
