What problem does it solve? Reviewing a branch or PR requires checking two separate things — whether the code follows the repo's documented standards and whether it actually implements what the issue or spec asked for — and mixing both in one pass lets one axis mask failures in the other. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Two-axis review: Runs a Standards review (documented repo standards plus a fixed Fowler code-smell baseline) and a Spec review (requirements coverage, scope creep, incorrect implementations) as parallel sub-agents, then reports them side by side. - Fixed-point diffing: Compares HEAD against any user-supplied commit, branch, tag, or merge-base using three-dot git diff, with upfront validation that the ref resolves and the diff is non-empty. - Spec discovery: Locates the originating spec from issue references in commit messages, a user-provided path, or spec files under docs/, specs/, or .scratch/. - Use Case: Before merging a feature branch, ask for a review since main — you get a Standards report citing violated conventions and code smells, plus a Spec report quoting requirement lines that are missing, partial, or out of scope. ## Quick Start Ask the agent to review the changes on this branch since main against the coding standards and the originating issue spec.
