code-review

Automates structured, multi-dimensional code review for pull requests.

Updated Mar 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/RaoXuntian/azurevm-openclaw-backup --skill code-review-raoxuntian
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review
Source: https://github.com/RaoXuntian/azurevm-openclaw-backup/tree/main/workspace-coding/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/RaoXuntian/azurevm-openclaw-backup --skill code-review-raoxuntian

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Systematic, structured guidance for evaluating code during pull requests to improve security, performance, correctness, and maintainability.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Review dimensions prioritized as Security → Performance → Correctness → Maintainability → Testing → Accessibility → Documentation
  • Security checklist including SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, authentication, and secrets management
  • Performance checklist addressing N+1 queries, memory usage, and bundle size
  • Correctness checklist for edge cases, null handling, race conditions, and timezone handling
  • Maintainability checklist focusing on naming, SRP, DRY, dead code, and dependency direction
  • Testing checklist covering coverage, edge cases, flaky tests, and mocking discipline
  • Three-pass review process: high-level, line-by-line, then edge cases
  • Severity levels (Critical, Major, Minor, Nitpick) with merge-blocking guidance
  • Guidance on giving actionable, structured feedback with examples

Quick Start

Run the code-review tool on the target pull request to generate a structured, multi-dimension review.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I standardize pull request reviews for security and maintainability?▼

Standardize pull request reviews by applying a structured three-pass process with severity levels and comprehensive checklists across security, performance, correctness, and maintainability to ensure consistent, repeatable code assessments.

What is the best way to check a pull request for security vulnerabilities like SQL injection and XSS?▼

Check pull requests for vulnerabilities using a dedicated security checklist that evaluates SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, authentication, and secrets management, prioritizing these checks first in the multi-dimension review process.

How do I structure code review feedback to be actionable and consistent?▼

Structure code review feedback using defined severity levels—Critical, Major, Minor, and Nitpick—along with merge-blocking guidance to provide actionable, repeatable assessments with clear examples for developers.

Does this code review process cover performance and testing edge cases?▼

Yes, the code review process covers performance by checking N+1 queries and memory usage, and evaluates testing by assessing coverage, edge cases, flaky tests, and mocking discipline through a dedicated line-by-line and edge case review pass.

What checklists are included for maintainability and correctness in code reviews?▼

Maintainability checklists evaluate naming, SRP, DRY, dead code, and dependency direction, while correctness checklists assess edge cases, null handling, race conditions, and timezone handling during the review.