skills.rest
graysurf
graysurfCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

code-review-quick-pass

Review small pull request diffs and provide verdicts with escalation rationale.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
Search Tags:#automation#diff#quality-assurance#code-review#pull-request#review-workflow#risk-escalation
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/graysurf/agent-runtime-kit --skill code-review-quick-pass
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review-quick-pass
Source: https://github.com/graysurf/agent-runtime-kit/tree/main/tests/golden/claude/plugins/code-review/skills/code-review-quick-pass/expected
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/graysurf/agent-runtime-kit --skill code-review-quick-pass

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Lightweight, read-only review of small diffs to surface findings and escalation rationale, speeding up feedback without modifying code or blocking PR progress.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Quick, read-only assessment of small diffs with clear findings and escalation paths.
  • Dispatches the reviewed scope to a subagent (reviewer-quick) and synthesizes its verdict for you.
  • Escalation paths to code-review-specialists or pre-merge gates for high-risk changes.
  • Use Case: A minor change in a PR receives a fast verdict, comments, and risk notes without a full specialist review.

Quick Start

Run the quick-pass workflow against the diff by supplying the base ref and optional focus notes to receive a concise verdict and findings.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review-quick-pass

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate a code review for small pull request diffs?▼

Automating a code review for small pull request diffs involves running a lightweight read-only workflow that supplies a verdict, findings, and escalation rationale to accelerate feedback without modifying code.

What is a read-only code review workflow and when should I use it?▼

A read-only code review workflow assesses minor pull request changes to provide quick verdicts and risk notes without blocking PR progress. Use it for routine diffs that do not require a full specialist review.

How do I get a quick code review verdict with escalation paths for risky changes?▼

To get a quick verdict with escalation paths, supply the diff base ref and optional focus notes to the review workflow, which synthesizes findings and routes high-risk changes to code-review-specialists or pre-merge gates.

Does automated pull request review work without modifying the source code?▼

Automated pull request review can operate in a read-only mode to surface findings and risk notes without modifying code or blocking PR progress, ensuring fast feedback for minor changes.

What are the limitations of lightweight automated code review for pull requests?▼

Lightweight automated code review is limited to routine, small diffs. It escalates high-risk changes to code-review-specialists or pre-merge gates rather than performing deep specialist analysis itself.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
remix-runremix-run
33.3k

review-pr

Review Remix pull requests from a local checkout for correctness and security.

Official
Intermediate
skylarsaboskylarsabo

pr-review

Review code changes against quality and security lenses before merging.

Community
Advanced
gquthiergquthier
14

requesting-code-review

Dispatch a reviewer subagent to validate code changes before merging.

Community
Advanced
loomantixloomantix
2

deepgrill

Orchestrate multi-lane adversarial code review for high-risk pull requests.

Official
Advanced