What problem does it solve? Reviewing code changes consistently is hard: reviewers miss requirement gaps, conflate style preferences with real defects, or review stale snapshots. This Skill provides a disciplined, read-only review workflow that freezes the exact scope under review, separates requirement/correctness concerns from project standards, and reports only evidence-backed findings ranked by consequence. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Scoped Git review recipes: Handles branch/PR reviews, staged-only, unstaged, pre-commit, uncommitted work, and diffs since a specified commit, with trust-boundary checks before running any Git command. - Two-lens analysis: Evaluates requirement conformance and correctness separately from project standards, keeping spec evidence distinct while ranking real risks together. - Incoming feedback assessment: Evaluates review comments with accept/reject/needs-evidence/defer dispositions, including guidance for reviewer-becomes-author situations. - Use Case: Before merging a pull request, ask for a review of the branch against its merge base; receive findings with location, requirement, failure scenario, evidence, and the smallest useful fix, plus a summary of checks actually run. ## Quick Start Review the uncommitted changes in this repository for correctness and requirement coverage, and report findings without modifying any files.
