What problem does it solve? Code reviews often miss critical defects, drown important findings in style nitpicks, or produce vague feedback that authors cannot act on. This Skill structures the review process so every material issue in a pull request, diff, or patch is identified, located, and explained with a concrete remediation path. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Prioritized Review Order: Systematically checks correctness, security and privacy, regression risk, reliability and operations, performance, maintainability, and test coverage in that sequence. - Structured Finding Format: Each issue reports severity, precise file location, triggering condition, likely consequence, why existing safeguards fail, and a focused fix direction. - Feedback Evaluation: Verifies claims from other reviewers against the actual code and tests, accepting sound feedback and challenging incorrect assumptions with evidence. - Use Case: A developer opens a pull request modifying authentication middleware. The Skill inspects the diff and surrounding call sites, flags a missing rate-limit check on a new endpoint as a high-severity security finding, and notes that no test covers the failure path. ## Quick Start Review the changes in this pull request and report any correctness, security, or regression issues with severity and suggested fixes.