What problem does it solve? Code reviews often conflate two separate questions: does the code follow the project's standards, and does it actually implement what was asked for? This Skill separates those axes so one cannot mask the other, and runs both checks in parallel sub-agents to keep their contexts clean. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Two-axis review: Evaluates the diff against documented repo standards (plus a built-in Fowler code-smell baseline) and against the originating issue or spec, reported side by side. - Parallel sub-agents: Spawns independent Standards and Spec sub-agents so findings from one axis never pollute or rerank the other. - Flexible fixed points: Reviews any diff from a commit, branch, tag, or merge-base (e.g. main, HEAD~5) using three-dot diff semantics. - Use Case: Before merging a feature branch, ask for a review since main and receive a Standards report citing violated conventions and smells, plus a Spec report listing missing requirements and scope creep. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to review the changes on this branch since main against the coding standards and the originating issue.
