code-review-and-quality

Evaluate code quality across correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance.

Updated May 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/soloamente/still --skill code-review-and-quality-soloamente
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-review-and-quality
Source: https://github.com/soloamente/still/tree/main/.cursor/skills/code-review-and-quality
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/soloamente/still --skill code-review-and-quality-soloamente

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill conducts a comprehensive multi-axis review of code to assess quality across correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance before merging changes into the main branch.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-axis Code Review: Evaluates code for correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance.
  • Use Case: Ideal for before merging changes, during feature implementations, when code is written by an AI agent, after bug fixes, and during refactoring.

Quick Start

Conduct a code review with the Skill by using the command: code-review-and-quality -i my-code-file.ts

Frequently Asked Questions about code-review-and-quality

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a multi-axis code review before merging changes?▼

Use the Skill via command line by passing your file as input, such as `code-review-and-quality -i my-code-file.ts`. This triggers a multi-axis evaluation of correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance for your pre-merge or post-implementation analysis.

Can I audit code security and performance automatically after an AI agent writes it?▼

Yes, you can audit AI-generated code by running a security analysis and performance auditing process. This evaluates the implementation for vulnerabilities and inefficiencies, providing feedback suitable for refining AI-generated code and bug fixes.

What is the best way to assess code architecture and readability during refactoring?▼

Assess code architecture and readability during refactoring by running a multi-axis review. It evaluates structural design and clarity, ensuring programming practices meet quality standards before finalizing changes.

Does this code review process work without external dependencies or environment setup?▼

Yes, this code review process works without external dependencies. It operates standalone to evaluate code quality, allowing you to assess correctness and security without configuring additional environment setup tools.

When should I use an automated code quality evaluation instead of manual review?▼

Automated code quality evaluation should be used for pre-merge reviews, AI agent outputs, and refactoring to quickly identify architectural, security, and performance issues. Manual review remains better for nuanced business logic decisions.