What problem does it solve? Reviewing a large implementation by hand is error-prone: reviewers miss SPEC mismatches, plan deviations, authorization leaks, and missing tests. This Skill provides a disciplined, read-only review workflow that checks a substantial change against its approved SPEC and PLAN, engineering rules, and security boundaries, then reports only actionable findings with evidence. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Plan-backed review: Verifies the exact SPEC and PLAN status before reviewing, and routes to a diff-only review when those artifacts are missing or unapproved. - Mechanical and structural checks: Runs only configured, non-installing checks (tests, typecheck, lint, dependency-cruiser, knip, spectral, betterleaks, ast-grep) and uses structural indexes like CodeGraph for caller and blast-radius analysis. - Evidence-backed findings report: Outputs severity-ordered findings with exact path/line evidence, impact, remediation, verified checks, and residual risk. - Use Case: After an engineer finishes a feature branch with an approved PLAN, ask for a full code review to confirm the implementation matches the SPEC, has no authorization or data-integrity regressions, and includes adequate tests before merge. ## Quick Start Review the current working-tree diff against the approved SPEC and PLAN, and report actionable findings with file and line evidence without editing any code.
