code-quality-review

Audit Tastik codebases for maintainability and architectural issues with prioritized reports.

Updated Feb 4, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/FabioFiorita/tastik --skill code-quality-review-fabiofiorita
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-quality-review
Source: https://github.com/FabioFiorita/tastik/tree/main/.agents/skills/code-quality-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/FabioFiorita/tastik --skill code-quality-review-fabiofiorita

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Provides systematic, tech-lead level audits of a codebase to identify maintainability, architectural, and quality gaps, enabling reliable long-term evolution.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured audit framework covering architecture, SOLID adherence, DRY principles, testability, and conventions.
  • Repeatable process that guides exploration, classification, prioritization, fixes, and verification.
  • Actionable guidance for single-file, component, or full-project sweeps with clear severity tags and remediation steps.
  • Use cases include refactor planning, onboarding new contributors, enforcing coding standards, and improving test coverage.

Quick Start

Ask me to run a code-quality review on a specific file, folder, or feature to generate a prioritized, actionable report.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-quality-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a code quality audit to identify architecture and maintainability issues?▼

A code quality review identifies maintainability and architectural issues by systematically evaluating SOLID adherence, DRY principles, and testability. It produces a prioritized, actionable report with severity tags and clear remediation steps for long-term evolution.

Can I use this to plan a refactoring task for frontend components and backend functions?▼

Yes, you can use this code quality review to plan refactoring tasks for frontend components, hooks, and backend Convex functions. The audit applies framework best practices to generate severity-guided fixes and actionable guidance for your codebase.

What is the best way to enforce SOLID and DRY principles during a codebase sweep?▼

The best way to enforce SOLID and DRY principles is through a structured audit framework that guides exploration, classification, and prioritization. This process applies framework best practices to deliver a prioritized report with clear severity tags and remediation steps.

Does this code quality review work for onboarding new contributors and improving test coverage?▼

Yes, this code quality review works for onboarding new contributors and improving test coverage. It provides a repeatable process and actionable guidance that enforces coding standards and highlights testability gaps across single-file or full-project sweeps.

When should I not use a tech-lead level code quality audit for my project?▼

You should avoid a tech-lead level code quality audit if you need a quick syntax check rather than a systematic maintainability and architecture evaluation. The process is designed for structured refactor planning and enforcing standards, not surface-level linting.