claim-chart

Generate jurisdiction-aware patent or civil element charts with pin-cited evidence and gap detection.

Updated Dec 4, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/PolliticalSolutions/political-portal --skill claim-chart-polliticalsolutions
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: claim-chart
Source: https://github.com/PolliticalSolutions/political-portal/tree/main/.claude/skills/litigation-legal/claim-chart
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/PolliticalSolutions/political-portal --skill claim-chart-polliticalsolutions

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

It turns messy litigation or patent technical content into an element-by-element claim chart with pin-cites, so you can immediately see what is supported and what is missing.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Patent claim charts and auditing: map asserted claim limitations against an accused product, prior art, or an opposing chart with construction-aware handling.
  • Civil element charts for proof planning: map pleaded causes of action or defenses against the evidence to surface gaps for discovery, MSJ, or trial.
  • Gap detection as the priority output: produce a needs-evidence / gap list to drive next actions rather than produce unsupported conclusions.
  • Draft-only guardrails: enforces attorney verification posture and adds disclosed-document restrictions before using litigation materials.

Quick Start

Generate a patent claim chart in infringement mode for the asserted claims against the accused product, pin-citing every cell and returning the needs-evidence gap list.

Frequently Asked Questions about claim-chart

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I create a patent claim chart with pin-cited evidence for infringement analysis?▼

A patent claim chart maps asserted claim limitations against an accused product or prior art with pin-cited evidentiary support. It generates a structured markdown chart, applies construction-aware handling, and prioritizes a needs-evidence gap list to drive next actions.

What is the best way to map civil elements for proof planning and discovery?▼

Civil element mapping aligns pleaded causes of action or defenses against available evidence to surface proof gaps. It identifies missing elements for discovery, MSJ, or trial preparation while maintaining draft-only guardrails requiring attorney verification before conclusions.

Can I use a claim chart to identify missing evidence for invalidity arguments?▼

Yes, an invalidity claim chart maps prior art against patent claims with pin-cited support. It highlights limitations lacking evidentiary backing and outputs a prioritized gap detection list to focus next-step prior art searches.

How does gap detection work in an element chart for litigation?▼

Gap detection in an element chart evaluates each mapped limitation against disclosed evidence and flags unsupported cells. It produces a needs-evidence list as the priority output, directing discovery or audit actions rather than rendering unsupported conclusions.

Are there limitations when using disclosed litigation documents for evidence mapping?▼

Evidence mapping enforces safe handling of disclosed-document restrictions before processing litigation materials. It applies chart-as-draft guardrails and requires attorney verification posture, meaning outputs remain draft-only and construction-dependent until professionally reviewed.

Does claim chart generation support export formats for civil proof and patent auditing?▼

Claim chart generation produces structured markdown alongside export formats for both patent auditing and civil proof mapping. It requires jurisdiction-aware inputs and delivers pin-cited evidentiary support with a prioritized gap list for immediate action.