ck:retro

Generate code and project health reports from Git history.

1|Updated Jun 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/TNHoang2708/Gym_Ver2 --skill ck-retro-tnhoang2708
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ck:retro
Source: https://github.com/TNHoang2708/Gym_Ver2/tree/main/.claude/skills/retro
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/TNHoang2708/Gym_Ver2 --skill ck-retro-tnhoang2708

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill streamlines the post-sprint analysis by automating the collection and interpretation of code health and project metrics directly from Git history, ensuring a comprehensive and data-driven retrospective.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated Git Metrics Collection: Gather data such as commits, lines of code, hotspots, churn, and commit type distribution.
  • Health Indicator Computation: Compute key health indicators like velocity, churn rate, and test-to-code ratio.
  • Structured Reporting: Generate a structured markdown or HTML report for easy review and action planning.

Quick Start

Execute the ck:retro command with the desired timeframe, e.g., ck:retro 1m to get a report for the last month.

Frequently Asked Questions about ck:retro

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate a retrospective report from Git history for a post-sprint review?▼

You can generate a retrospective report by running the analysis command with a desired timeframe, such as `ck:retro 1m` for the last month. It collects Git metrics like commits, churn, and hotspots, and outputs a structured markdown or HTML report.

What code health metrics can I extract from Git history for a project retrospective?▼

Git history analysis can extract code health metrics such as commit type distribution, lines of code, hotspots, churn rate, velocity, and test-to-code ratio. These indicators provide data-driven insights for post-sprint reviews.

Do I need Git installed to analyze project health metrics for a sprint review?▼

Yes, Git is required for data retrieval and analysis to compute project health metrics. The tool directly analyzes your Git history to gather data and generate comprehensive retrospective reports.

Can I export code health retrospective reports in HTML format?▼

Yes, you can export retrospective reports in either markdown or HTML format. This allows for easy review and action planning during post-sprint reviews, weekly check-ins, and review periods.

What is the best way to automate code churn and velocity analysis for weekly check-ins?▼

Automating code churn and velocity analysis is best handled by running the retrospective command with a weekly timeframe parameter. It automatically computes health indicators from Git history and outputs a structured report.

What's the difference between using Git history analysis and manual metrics tracking for a retrospective report?▼

Git history analysis automates the collection and interpretation of code health metrics directly from commit data, ensuring a data-driven retrospective. Manual tracking requires gathering these indicators by hand, which is less efficient for post-sprint reviews.