skills.rest
hotriluan
hotriluanCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

ck:predict

Analyze proposed changes across five expert personas to surface architecture, security, performance, and UX risks.

1|Updated Mar 5, 2026
Search Tags:#architecture#performance#security#ux#design-review#multi-persona
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/hotriluan/alkana_web --skill ck-predict
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ck:predict
Source: https://github.com/hotriluan/alkana_web/tree/main/.opencode/skills/ck-predict
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/hotriluan/alkana_web --skill ck-predict

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Coordinated, multi-persona pre-analysis of proposed changes to surface architecture, security, performance, and UX risks before implementation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Independent persona analyses executed in parallel to surface diverse concerns.
  • Structured debate and a consensus verdict that highlights agreements and conflicts.
  • Actionable risk summaries and recommendations to guide design and planning.
  • Ideal for major features, refactors, or architecture decisions across product teams.

Quick Start

Provide a proposed change description to ck:predict to receive a structured risk verdict and recommendations.

Frequently Asked Questions about ck:predict

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate architecture and security risks before coding a major feature?▼

A multi-persona design review identifies and debates proposed changes across five expert personas. It surfaces architecture, security, performance, and UX risks before implementation begins, providing a structured verdict and actionable recommendations for release planning.

What is the best way to pre-validate a significant refactor across product teams?▼

The best way to pre-validate a significant refactor is executing parallel independent persona analyses. This process highlights agreements and conflicts among architecture, security, performance, and UX viewpoints, producing actionable risk summaries that guide design and planning across teams.

Can I use multi-persona analysis for architectural decisions in software engineering?▼

Yes, you can use multi-persona analysis for architectural decisions. It applies coordinated pre-analysis to surface diverse concerns across five expert personas, yielding a structured risk verdict that highlights conflicts and agreements before implementation starts.

How do I get a structured risk summary for a proposed product change?▼

You get a structured risk summary by providing the proposed change description for multi-persona pre-analysis. The process evaluates the change across architecture, security, performance, and UX dimensions, generating a consensus verdict and actionable recommendations.

When do I need a consensus verdict from multiple expert perspectives?▼

You need a consensus verdict when planning major features or architectural decisions. It highlights agreements and conflicts from independent persona analyses, ensuring architecture, security, performance, and UX risks are debated and resolved before coding begins.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
cryborg1211cryborg1211

vc:predict

Analyze proposed changes with five personas and output a verdict.

Community
Advanced
jshsakurajshsakura
22

qa-expert

Define risk-based test scope and acceptance criteria for software releases.

Community
Advanced
robertbr123robertbr123

requesting-code-review

Automate code review with security scans, quality checks, and automated fixes.

Community
Advanced
Axel-DaMageAxel-DaMage
2

security-reviewer

Identify security vulnerabilities in code and infrastructure and generate audit reports.

Community
Advanced